Saltar al contenido

Use cases by sector

Property management and communities

Many communities, many suppliers, and owners who want to see things.

Updated on 13/08/2026

A managing agent runs dozens of communities at once, each with its suppliers, minutes, mandatory inspections and owners asking questions. It is the same work repeated many times, with the particularity that each community is a separate client and cannot see the others' material.

What accumulates per community

BlockWhat it includesWho asks for it
Minutes and resolutionsMeetings, votes, approved leviesOwners, and sometimes a court
SuppliersMaintenance, cleaning, lifts, insuranceThe community itself and insurers
Mandatory inspectionsLifts, fire systems, water safety, building surveysInspectors and insurers
IncidentsBreakdowns, claims, worksOwners and loss adjusters

Important

The third block creates liability for the agent. A lapsed mandatory inspection in a community you manage is your problem as well as theirs, and warnings with margin are the only realistic way to control it across twenty communities.

What solves the most

  1. 1

    One file per community, genuinely separated

    Each is a client: one cannot see another's.

  2. 2

    Due dates per community with an owner

    Lifts, insurance, inspections. That is where the risk sits.

  3. 3

    Supplier documentation requested and renewed automatically

    Insurance and certificates, once a year with automatic chasing.

  4. 4

    And what owners may consult, accessible

    It cuts calls and emails more than anything else.

Watch out

Watch the minutes: they are the document most requested years later and the worst preserved, because they circulate on paper and by email. Minutes signed and kept in the community's file are found in seconds; hunting for them in a six-year-old archive is not.

When the agent changes

That last point is also a commercial argument: arriving at a new community and finding an ordered, exportable archive says a lot about the previous agent, for better or worse.

Worth knowing

The pattern is identical to a consultancy running compliance for several clients: many identical files, separated, each with its own calendar and a portion visible to the client.

Can owners see everything?

Whatever the community decides; usually their own and common material, not third-party data.

What about levies and payments?

Those live in your management system; documentation and its evidence live here.

Does it suit a single large community?

Yes, though the biggest saving appears with many.

A real case

The situation

An agent manages twenty-two communities and tracks inspections in a spreadsheet.

What you do

  1. Builds a file per community with due dates and owners
  2. Requests supplier documentation annually with automatic renewal

What you get

Stops discovering lapsed inspections when the inspector or the claim arrives.

The situation

A property manager handles forty communities and an owner asks to see their building's lift contract.

What you do

  1. Organises one file per community
  2. Gives read access to what belongs to each
  3. Records what was shared and with whom

What you get

The owner sees theirs without anyone stopping to hunt for it, and without reaching other communities.

The situation

A supplier works across several communities and their documentation is requested four times.

What you do

  1. Keeps their file once and links it to each community

What you get

The supplier delivers once and it serves all.

The situation

An insurance policy expires in one community and nobody notices.

What you do

  1. Records expiries per community

What you get

The warning arrives before the meeting.

The situation

A meeting is called and documentation is missing.

What you do

  1. Checks what is missing in advance

What you get

The meeting happens with everything on the table.

The situation

An owner asks you to evidence a cost from two years ago.

What you do

  1. Checks that community's file

What you get

You answer without searching cabinets.

The situation

The chair changes and the context is lost.

What you do

  1. Keeps the file independent of individuals

What you get

The handover does not restart the work.

The situation

Information from another community is shared with an owner.

What you do

  1. Checks the scope before sharing

What you get

Information does not cross.

This article answers

  • property management documentation
  • managing agent paperwork
  • community meeting minutes and resolutions
  • community suppliers insurance